Scientific consultation and guidance. Evaluation criteria associated with the course work

Scientific consultation and guidance. Evaluation criteria associated with the course work

The clinical manager of this program tasks are appointed because of the Department of Sociology, centering on the product range of medical passions of instructors and the quantity of academic training load.

The key tasks associated with the manager

The main task associated with the manager – advising and monitoring the entire process of utilization of student coursework.

The obligations associated with the manager include:

– support in seeking the subject associated with the program work and also the development Of a ongoing work plan;

– performing systematic consultations with the pupil on problems of work;

– support into the range of research practices;

– advising the pupil in the collection of types of literary works and factual product;

– monitoring the progress of work with accordance utilizing the founded plan and certification that is intermediate of pupil;

– work assessment.

Evaluation criteria associated with the program work

The criteria that are main the evaluation of coursework consist of:

– the correctness associated with reported function and goals associated with work and their conformity with all the content regarding the work;

– freedom of this writer’s way of the disclosure associated with topic, such as the formula and reason of their approach that is own to research dilemmas;

– persistence and presentation that is structured of product, such as thequality of the conclusion and introduction, the connection and continuity Between the right elements of the job, involving the theoretical and practical areas of the analysis;

– the standard of the analysis together with capability to utilize the ways of clinical research, like the quality of analysis obtainable in the literature methods to the study for the dilemmas in mind;

– The practical importance of the program work, like the connection of theoretical roles considered when you look at the work, with repetition;

– the correctness for the utilization of sources, including conformity with all the guidelines for compiling a list of sources;

– conformity utilizing the coursework design demands, precision of design, the lack of spelling and errors that are grammatical the written text (especially whenever using unique terminology);

– the contribution that is personal of author into the analysis and research of the subject.

Conformity with all the guidelines of research ethics

While preparing a program work, unique attention is compensated to pupils’ conformity aided by the guidelines of research ethics. In no full situation should plagiarism, falsification of data and quoting that is”false be properly used.

We mean direct borrowing without appropriate as we mention plagiarism sources to your printed or electronic sources, previously defended last qualifying works, master’s and doctoral dissertations.

Whenever we state the falsification of information, we suggest up to a fake or change the supply information to be able to show the correctness regarding the summary (confirmation regarding the theory, etc.), along with the use that is deliberate of false information as a foundation for analysis.

False quote means the presence of links towards the supply as soon as the provided supply will not include such information or shows a page that is invalid.

Detection of ethical breaches contributes to bad assessment.

The finding of the violations of expert ethics may be the foundation for reducing markings for program work, as much as grading “unsatisfactory”.

Course work is ranked for a scale that is five-point. The supervisor evaluates the work thinking about the quality for the text (in other words. its content custom writing, logic and argumentation), the theoretical and level that is methodological of, plus the completeness associated with the supply database. Along with the use and knowledge of the literary works on the subject, the correctness of this formula and solution of the extensive research issue, the legitimacy and legitimacy associated with conclusions work, the proper design associated with the work, along with the quality of message during the protection in addition to power to lead a discussion that is scientific.